Student Achievement Report

8.1

The institution identifies, evaluates, and publishes goals and outcomes for student achievement appropriate to the institution's mission, the nature of the students it serves, and the kinds of programs offered. The institution uses multiple measures to document student success. (Student Achievement) [CR]

 

Narrative:

The mission of the ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ is to be Innovative. Inclusive. Engaged. Evolving. Global.

As a student-centered, regional, state-assisted institution of higher education, the ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ pursues engaging in teaching, research, and service in order to provide educational opportunities for students, an environment for discovery and creative accomplishment, and a variety of outreach activities meeting the professional, civic, social, cultural, and economic development needs of our region in the context of a global community.

The 2024-2029 ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ Strategic Plan identifies six themes through which this is accomplished: Student-centric Excellence, Sustainable Growth and Infrastructure, Community Engagements and Partnerships, Financial Viability, Communication, Transparency and Accountability, and Institutional Identity.

Identified Measures of Student Achievement (Criteria)

Table 1 identifies the measures selected by the university for which it identifies, evaluates, and publishes goals and outcomes for student achievement appropriate to the institution's mission.
Table 1.  Identified Measures of Achievement
Measure 
Goal
Threshold of Acceptability
1. IPEDS 150% Graduation Rate
increase 150% graduation rates by 
equal to or exceeding the average rate of our peers 
2. Retention Rate
Increase retention rates
equal to or exceeding the average rate of our peers 
3. Job Placement Rates
Increase  by college
year over year increases
4. State licensing examinations
Be competitive in state licensing examinations scores 
specific to the program (see thresholds below)
The measures selected will be discussed in detail, including their data sources and measures, in the following section. 
Measures 1 and 2: The IPEDS Graduation and Retention Rate (based on Institutional Annual Profile submissions)
In March 2019, in response to a request by SACSCOC, The ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ selected the  (150% standard time) as its student completion indicator. ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ identified ten official peers during a ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ Board of Trustees Program Analysis in 2017. These ten peers were established through an IPEDS peer analysis and were approved by the Program Analysis Academic and Academic Support Committee. These peers were used as a basis of comparison: 
  • Austin Peay State University
  • Columbus State University
  • Jacksonville State University
  • McNeese State University
  • Morehead State University
  • Southern University and A&M College
  • University of North Carolina at Pembroke
  • West Texas A&M University 
  • Winthrop University
  • Armstrong State University (Absorbed by Georgia Southern and not included in data)
Student achievement goals (target levels of performance/thresholds of acceptability).  The ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ has identified the threshold of acceptability for this particular achievement measure would be ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ's graduation and retention rate (as reported to IPEDS for the annual Graduation Rate report) will be equal to or exceeding the average rate of its peers. "Peers" are those identified as being reported to SACSCOC as peer institutions for ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ, and they are those peers which were previously determined by the university as mentioned above. The university demonstrates the appropriateness of its chosen thresholds of acceptability by comparing its graduation and retention data to that of its peers. The peer group identified is similar in scope to the ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ in the following ways: enrollment, tuition cost, retention and graduation rates, faculty and staff size, programs offered, and student full-time equivalent (FTE). Peer identification data and the selection of peers at ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ is based upon the IPEDS Peer Assessment. As stated in the ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ Strategic Plan, the University desires to "pursue a cohesive and shared institutional identity focused on student learning and engagement-locally, regionally, and globally" (Theme Five: Institutional Identity). As such, the university chooses to compare its own achievement to its peers so that it is aligned and exceeds those trends identified within the peer comparisons. Additionally, aspiration goals have been set for both graduation and retention rates. The institutional goal, as indicated in the ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ 2019-2024 Strategic Plan, is to have a 10 percentage point increase in graduation rate by 2024. The institutional goal for retention is to increase year-over-year.

Measure 1: Graduation Rates

The tables below (2 through 6) show the graduation rates for both ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ and its peers for the most updated IPEDS cohorts 2014, 2013, and 2012.This data was captured from IPEDS 150% graduation rate report utilizing the group comparisons feature. The percentages reflect the number of those in the cohort who graduated in 150% time (six years). The 2015 cohort information will be posted to IPEDS in fall 2022, with the 2016 cohort data being reported to IPEDS this past spring 2021.
Table 2. ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ IPEDS Six-Year Graduation Rate Overall Peer Comparison*
Six-Year Graduation Rate 2014 Cohort 2013 Cohort 2012 Cohort
Austin Peay State University 48.3% 43.3% 40.6%
Columbus State University 38.2% 38.0% 36.9%
Jacksonville State University 45.5% 41.3% 42.5%
McNeese State University 43.5% 46.6% 45.2%
Morehead State University 43.1% 45.9% 44.6%
Southern University and A&M College 28.2% 40.9% 30.4%
ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ 49.9% 48.6% 45.7%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 42.5% 41.0% 40.7%
West Texas A&M University 44.3% 45.3% 43.7%
Winthrop University 60.8% 63.4% 53.2%
Peer Average 43.8% 45.1% 42.0%
*This data was captured from IPEDS 150% graduation rate report utilizing the group comparisons feature
Table 2 indicates that ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ's 6-year graduation rate surpasses its peer group average for the three most recent cohorts IPEDS has available. While ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ has exceeded the benchmark for each of the years listed, the university has also increased its graduation rate by nearly 7 percentage points over the past five years (44.5% (2011 cohort) to 51.2% (2015 cohort)).
According to the data reported in Table 2 and the trend of the university's increasing graduation rate, the ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ is projected to meet its aspiration goal (as indicated in the ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ 2019-2024 Strategic Plan) of a 10-percentage point increase by 2024.  
 
The graduation rate (150%) is broken down by gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status in the following tables (5 through 7) in order to identify any student achievement trends that need to be addressed. 
Table 3. ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ IPEDS 6-YR Graduation Rate Peer Gender Comparison*

6-Yr Graduation

Rate by Gender

Cohort 2014 Cohort 2013 Cohort 2012
Men Women Men Women Men Women
Austin Peay State University 39.5% 54.8% 36.7% 48.2% 34.8% 44.5%
Columbus State University 37.3% 38.9% 32.3% 41.7% 31.8% 40.3%
Jacksonville State University 38.7% 51.9% 33.2% 49.0% 35.8% 47.6%
McNeese State University 39.7% 46.0% 41.4% 49.8% 40.2% 48.5%
Morehead State University 39.0% 46.1% 43.9% 47.4% 40.3% 47.6%
Southern University and A&M College 23.3% 31.6% 31.6% 46.6% 23.3% 35.0%
ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ 41.2% 55.8% 44.1% 51.7% 38.5% 51.3%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 38.9% 45.4% 34.0% 46.3% 36.3% 44.6%
West Texas A&M University 36.5% 52.0% 38.3% 50.9% 34.8% 51.3%
Winthrop University 57.3% 62.2% 56.6% 66.4% 57.0% 33.3%
Peer Average 38.9% 47.6% 38.7% 49.6% 37.2% 43.6%
Graduation rates (150%) for ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ and its peers are provided by gender within Table 3. ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ's graduation rate for both males and females exceeds the peer average; thus satisfying the threshold of acceptability.
The following three tables (4, 5, and 6) contain the ethnicity breakdown of 150% graduation rates by peer institution for the past three cohorts. 

Table 4. 2014 Cohort, ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ IPEDS 6-YR Graduation Rate Ethnicity Peer Comparisons*
2014 Cohort American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black/African American Hispanic Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Two or More Races Race/Ethnicity Unknown Non-Resident Alien
Austin Peay State University 25.0% 57.1% 44.3% 50.9% 33.3% 49.2% 50.6% 42.1% 50.0%
Columbus State University 0.0% 33.3% 31.3% 43.6% 43.9% 14.3% 37.5%
Jacksonville State University 33.3% 60.0% 28.2% 26.3% 100.0% 51.1% 40.0% 38.2%
McNeese State University 16.7% 72.2% 33.2% 47.5% 44.4% 35.7% 70.0%
Morehead State University 33.3% 25.0% 28.4% 42.3% 0.0% 44.0% 40.0% 66.7% 40.0%
Southern University and A&M College 0.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 17.6% 44.4% 0.0% 0.0%
ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ 100.0% 0.0% 37.9% 48.1% 52.6% 38.7% 51.2% 50.0%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 43.6% 19.0% 43.1% 39.7% 45.1% 31.3% 31.3% 10.0%
West Texas A&M University 25.0% 50.0% 24.1% 39.9% 0.0% 50.8% 33.3% 9.5% 53.3%
Winthrop University 28.6% 56.3% 55.5% 52.9% 0.0% 65.2% 59.5% 33.3%
Peer Average 22.8% 47.0% 35.2% 38.1% 22.2% 45.7% 38.7% 31.6% 36.9%
Table 5. 2013 Cohort, ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ IPEDS 6-YR Graduation Rate Ethnicity Peer Comparisons*
2013 Cohort American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black/African American Hispanic Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Two or More Races Race/Ethnicity Unknown Non-Resident Alien
Austin Peay State University 0.0% 60.0% 41.7% 37.3% 0.0% 43.6% 46.4% 48.1% 50.0%
Columbus State University 0.0% 23.8% 36.9% 46.1% 37.9% 33.3% 64.7%
Jacksonville State University 28.6% 57.1% 26.8% 23.1% 45.4% 36.4% 60.0%
McNeese State University 20.0% 66.7% 31.8% 45.5% 100.0% 50.3% 36.2% 0.0% 62.5%
Morehead State University 25.0% 25.0% 42.7% 50.0% 0.0% 45.9% 47.6% 60.0% 83.3%
Southern University and A&M College 100.0% 100.0% 40.9% 42.9% 0.0% 30.4% 47.8% 0.0% 0.0%
ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ 60.0% 57.1% 37.1% 35.3% 50.9% 52.5% 54.5% 60.0%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 44.4% 36.4% 40.5% 36.1% 0.0% 41.4% 50.0% 37.5% 20.0%
West Texas A&M University 50.0% 45.5% 24.2% 40.2% 51.6% 26.5% 23.5% 50.0%
Winthrop University 0.0% 64.7% 59.7% 60.0% 66.7% 65.9% 64.7% 50.0% 66.7%
Peer Average 29.8% 53.2% 38.4% 42.3% 27.8% 45.8% 44.1% 31.9% 50.8%
Table 6. 2012 Cohort, ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ IPEDS 6-YR Graduation Rate Ethnicity Peer Comparisons*
2012 Cohort American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black/African American Hispanic Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Two or More Races Race/Ethnicity Unknown Non-Resident Alien
Austin Peay State University 0.0% 61.5% 35.0% 45.0% 0.0%

41.6%

45.8% 36.4% 100.0%
Columbus State University 16.7% 58.3% 34.0% 28.1% 0.0% 40.0% 28.3% 70.0%
Jacksonville State University 28.6% 27.3% 29.2% 40.0% 47.4% 38.9% 66.7%
McNeese State University 35.7% 45.0% 35.2% 50.0% 33.3% 47.0% 29.2% 100.0% 84.2%
Morehead State University 0.0% 50.0% 31.1% 50.0% 50.0% 45.3% 56.5% 25.0% 46.7%
Southern University and A&M College 31.3% 27.3% 9.1% 27.3% 0.0% 13.3%
ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ 31.3% 33.3% 32.2% 28.6% 100.0% 50.6% 52.2% 23.5% 52.6%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 38.1% 28.6% 42.5% 28.3% 42.2% 26.7% 55.6% 25.0%
West Texas A&M University 14.3% 35.7% 15.3% 41.9% 48.4% 43.8% 35.3% 57.1%
Winthrop University 52.6% 53.4% 50.0% 0.0% 57.4% 66.7% 100.0% 58.3%
Peer Average 23.2% 45.0% 33.7% 34.5% 28.2% 43.1% 44.7% 43.7% 57.9%
*This data was captured from IPEDS 150% graduation rate report utilizing the group comparisons feature
Tables 4, 5, and 6 also contain 150% graduation rates for ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ and its peer institutions by ethnicity. The following ethnicity groups are identified: American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White. Those who identify as two or more races, nonresident aliens, and whose ethnicity is unknown are also included. In 2020, the ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ exceeds the threshold of acceptability (peer average) for each ethnicity except for Asian (there were 3 Asian students in the 2020 cohort and all three transferred). In 2019, ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ exceeded the peer average for all tonicities with the exception of Black or African American and Hispanic. In 2018, ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ exceeded the peer average for American Indian/Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islanders, White, and Multi-Racial. Tables 4, 5, and 6 demonstrate that ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ has made a positive impact on increasing the graduation rates of its underrepresented populations, specifically our two largest groups of underrepresented minorities: Black and African American and Hispanic students. Additionally, in reviewing all three tables, the most recent data available from IPEDS demonstrates a higher rate than the peer average for every ethnicity (excluding the Asian students given the low n represented in the cohort; Asian = 3 for the 2014 cohort). 
Table 7.  ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ IPEDS Graduation Rate Peer Comparison by Pell Recipients*
Pell Grant Recipients 6-Yr Graduation Rate Cohort 2014 Cohort 2013 Cohort 2012
Austin Peay State University 39.0% 34.9% 32.8%
Columbus State University 31.3% 37.4% 31.3%
Jacksonville State University 36.2% 33.5% 34.4%
McNeese State University 36.7% 36.0% 35.2%
Morehead State University 32.9% 36.9% 38.6%
Southern University and A&M College 26.9% 29.5% 21.9%
ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ 41.3% 36.9% 34.6%
University of North Carolina at Pembroke 41.3% 38.8% 40.2%
West Texas A&M University 38.3% 37.0% 36.8%
Winthrop University 55.0% 55.7% 48.9%
Peer Average 37.9% 37.7% 35.6%
*This data was captured from IPEDS 150% graduation rate report utilizing the group comparisons feature
The Pell recipients (revised cohort) for each institution are represented in the cohort. The percentages reflect the number of those in the cohort who graduated with a bachelor's degree in 150% time (6 years).
In Table 7, ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ identifies its graduation rates for those students classified as Pell recipients. This data was captured from IPEDS 150% graduate rate report utilizing the group comparisons feature. The retention of Pell recipients (revised cohort) for each institution is represented above. Table 7 demonstrates that ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ exceeded its peer average for the 2014 cohort, but for the 2013 and 2012 cohorts, it fell short of meeting the threshold of acceptability (peer average) in regard to the 6-year graduation rate for those students who received a Pell Grant.  

Measure 2: Retention

Regarding retention data for the ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ, table 8 shows the five-year retention trend of ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ compared to its peers for the 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015 cohorts. This was the most recent IPEDS data available.

Table 8. ÁñÁ«ÊÓÆµ IPEDS Five-Year Retention Rate Trend Peer Comparison*
Retention Cohort 2019 Coh